Factcheck Price is right behind the 'no' campaign, despite naysayers A change to Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price's parliamentary interests register is being used to sow uncertainty about her involvement with the campaign against the Indigenous voice. Read more
Factcheck Misinformation writ large in video on referendum's legitimacy A Facebook video is spreading falsehoods about the legality of the voice referendum and the Albanese government. Read more
Factcheck Two constitutions claim is sovereign citizen silliness Claims Australia has two separate constitutions are being spread online by conspiracy theorists who assert the nation is a corporation. Read more
Factcheck PM gets American accent in latest AI scam The prime minister is the latest household name to be used in an online 'deepfake' scam. Read more
Factcheck Video's referendum postal vote claim is junk A Facebook video attempts to undermine the upcoming voice vote with a series of claims relating to the running of the referendum. Read more
Factcheck Fanciful figures used to discredit Indigenous minister Social media posts claim Linda Burney has spent $490 billion while being in charge of Indigenous affairs for almost two decades. Read more
Factcheck Medicare funding comparison doesn't add up A social media video claims the National Indigenous Australians Agency has been allocated more government funding than Medicare. Read more
Factcheck Senator Price wrong with claim about PM's speech A leading 'no' campaigner has accused the prime minister of a major omission in his speech at the launch of the voice 'yes' campaign. Read more
Factcheck Indigenous citizenship myth shrouds 1967 referendum A myth dating from 1967 continues to spread online ahead of this year's Indigenous voice referendum. Read more
Factcheck Fantasy to claim Australia is a corporation There are claims the Australian government has no right to negotiate an Indigenous treaty because the country is a corporation. Read more
Factcheck Referendum rules on ticks and crosses are nothing new Social media posts claim the rules of the upcoming voice referendum governing valid and informal votes have been changed to favour the 'yes' campaign. Read more
Factcheck No, Indigenous people were never classified as fauna An urban myth about the legal classification of Indigenous people prior to the 1967 referendum has continued to spread on social media. Read more
Factcheck Post inflates Indigenous land ownership figure A Facebook user has claimed that Indigenous people exercise "control" over almost half the land in Australia. Read more
Factcheck Native fauna trademark fight fails to land any intellectual blows A video claims First Nations people have trademarked Australian plants and animals and governments are illegally using them as logos and symbols. Read more
Factcheck 'Open the oyster' claim confused on many levels A Facebook post claims a 'yes' result at the referendum would allow the government to make any changes it wants to the constitution relating to the voice or Indigenous people. Read more
Factcheck No, Aboriginal sovereignty is not written into the constitution A Facebook post claims the sovereignty of Aboriginal people is written into the country's founding document. Read more
Factcheck NZ court ruling claim overruled by legal experts A ruling in a New Zealand court case 36 years ago has been misinterpreted by opponents of the proposed Indigenous voice to parliament in Australia. Read more
Factcheck Referendum in 1967 did two things but Indigenous recognition wasn't one of them A number of Facebook posts claim that Indigenous Australians have been recognised in the Australian Constitution since 1967. Read more
Factcheck Were Aboriginal people counted in the census before 1967? The two sides of the voice referendum campaign dispute whether or not Aboriginal people were counted in the census prior to the 1967 referendum. Read more