Wind turbine energy claim is all spin and no power

Nik Dirga August 01, 2023
2b719b88 84ca 4ca0 93e4 858a74a9baf1
Multiple studies show wind turbines take under a year to offset the energy needed to create them. Image by Lukas Coch/AAP PHOTOS

WHAT WAS CLAIMED

Wind turbines must spin continuously for four years to replace the energy it took to manufacture them.

OUR VERDICT

False. It typically takes about six months for turbines to recoup the energy costs of making them.

Social media posts are full of hot air in claiming wind turbines take years of operation to make up for the energy needed to manufacture them.

This is false. Multiple studies show it only takes an average of six months for turbines to pay back the energy expended in making them.

A Facebook post (screenshot here1) makes several claims about wind turbines.

"The turbine has to spin continually for over 4 years just to replace the energy it took to manufacture it. Most turbine blades last 3 to 7 years," it states.

A screenshot of the Facebook post.
The Facebook post's claims are not based on reality.

The post is being shared across social media, as seen here, here and here.

Renewable energy expert Emeritus Professor Andrew Blakers2 3described the claim as "garbage".

Prof Blakers, from Australian National University's College of Engineering, Computing and Cybernetics4, won the 2023 Queen Elizabeth Prize for Engineering5.

He 6said it typically took about six months for turbines to achieve energy-payback time7, or EPBT, the time it takes for a system to generate more energy than it took to make it.

"There is extensive peer research on this point," Prof Blakers told AAP FactCheck.

Prof Cutler Cleveland8, associate director of the Institute for Global Sustainability9 at Boston University, also dismissed the claim.

"Research spanning a decade demonstrates that wind turbines have an energy payback period of one year or less," he told AAP FactCheck in an email.

Prof Cleveland co-authored a meta-analysis10 on the net energy return of wind power systems11 which found the energy return of investment, the ratio of energy delivered to energy costs, placed wind favourably in comparison to other technologies such as fossil fuels and nuclear.

The Codrington Wind Farm in south western Victoria (file image)
Analysis shows wind is better than fossil fuels, nuclear and solar in energy return on investment.

A report 12for the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change13 14found the median payback time was 5.4 months (Section 7.6.1.2 on Page 571).

Multiple studies back this up for different types and sizes of turbines.

* A 2020 British-Greek study 15found an EPBT of between 4-6 months.

* A 2014 US Pacific Northwest Study 16found the EPBT of two 2MW turbines was 5.2 and 6.4 months, respectively.

* A 2018 Texas study 17found the EPBT for 1MW to 5MW turbines in onshore, shallow water and deepwater locations to be about six to 17 months.

* A 2019 European study18 found the average EPBT of 4161 turbines to be 5.3 months.

* A 2022 Brazilian study 19determined the EPBT of a 2MW wind turbine was 0.494 years, or just under six months.

"Our own research indicates that wind energy has a lifetime payback (energy return on investment) of about 20:1," Prof Cleveland said.

"This places wind in a very favourable position relative to fossil fuels, nuclear, and solar."

A wind farm outside Bungendore near Canberra (file image)
Wind turbine blades usually last about two decades.

The claim turbine blades only last between three to seven years is also false.

A 2022 European study 20on the lifespan and recycling of turbine blades cited longevity of 18 to 25 years (Section 2.1), while a US Environmental Protection Agency report21 said their typical lifespan was 20 years (Page 2).

"The average life of wind turbine blades is 18 to 25 years, with 20 years as a widely used industry standard," Prof Cleveland told AAP FactCheck.

Prof Blakers agreed.

"Blades typically last the life of the turbine, nominally 20 years," he said.

AAP FactCheck has previously debunked the false claim that turbine generators only last a few years22.

Similar misleading claims about turbines have been fact-checked by Reuters23, 24USA Today25, 26Full Fact 27and PolitiFact28.

False - The claim is inaccurate.

AAP FactCheck is an accredited member of the International Fact-Checking Network29. To keep up with our latest fact checks, follow us on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.

Sources

  1. https://www-media.aap.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/01100010/Turbine.png
  2. https://researchers.anu.edu.au/researchers/blakers-aw
  3. https://researchers.anu.edu.au/researchers/blakers-aw
  4. https://cecc.anu.edu.au/
  5. https://qeprize.org/winners/professor-andrew-blakers
  6. https://qeprize.org/winners/professor-andrew-blakers
  7. https://energyeducation.ca/encyclopedia/Payback
  8. https://www.bu.edu/earth/profiles/cutler-j-cleveland/
  9. https://www.bu.edu/igs/
  10. https://himmelfarb.gwu.edu/tutorials/studydesign101/metaanalyses.cfm
  11. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S096014810900055X?via%3Dihub
  12. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/03/Chapter-7-Wind-Energy-1.pdf
  13. https://www.ipcc.ch/
  14. https://www.ipcc.ch/
  15. https://academic.oup.com/ce/article/4/1/48/5639689#201530418
  16. https://www.inderscienceonline.com/doi/full/10.1504/IJSM.2014.062496#:~:text=The%20energy%20payback%20period%20for%20the%20two%20turbine%20models%20are%20found%20to%20be%205.2%20and%206.4%20months
  17. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/6/2022
  18. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6686152/#:~:text=The%20greenhouse%20gas%20payback%20time%20of%20wind%20turbines%20in%20northwestern%20Europe%20varied%20between%201.8%20and%2022.5%20months%2C%20averaging%205.3%20months
  19. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frsus.2022.1060130/full#:~:text=Consideration%20of%20the%20energy%20consumed%20for%20the%20manufacture%20of%20the%20wind%20turbine%20yielded%20an%20energy%20payback%20of%200.494%20years
  20. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136403212101114X#bib8
  21. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2019-08/documents/wind_turbines_fact_sheet_p100il8k.pdf
  22. https://www.aap.com.au/factcheck/wind-turbine-lifespan-claim-generates-misinformation/
  23. https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-windturbines-misleadingmeme-idUSL1N2R31IG
  24. https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-windturbines-misleadingmeme-idUSL1N2R31IG
  25. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2022/06/07/fact-check-wind-turbines-quickly-recoup-energy-used-make-them/9542766002/
  26. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2022/06/07/fact-check-wind-turbines-quickly-recoup-energy-used-make-them/9542766002/
  27. https://fullfact.org/online/wind-turbines-energy/
  28. https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2021/oct/12/viral-image/actually-wind-turbines-easily-produce-more-power-i/
  29. https://www.poynter.org/ifcn/

Fact-checking is a team effort

Every AAP FactCheck article is the result of a meticulous process involving numerous experienced journalists and producers. Our articles are thoroughly researched, carefully crafted and rigorously scrutinised to ensure the highest standard of accuracy and objectivity in every piece.

AAP FactCheck is an accredited member of the International Fact-Checking Network